The debate between SD-WAN and MPLS continues to be one of the most critical decisions for enterprise network architects. While MPLS has served organizations well for decades, SD-WAN offers compelling advantages in cost, flexibility, and cloud integration. This comprehensive analysis helps you make an informed decision based on your specific requirements.
Understanding the Technologies
What is MPLS?
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is a mature WAN technology that routes traffic using labels rather than IP addresses. Cisco's MPLS documentation describes it as a high-performance method for forwarding packets through a private network.
Key MPLS Characteristics:
- Dedicated, private circuits between locations
- Predictable performance with guaranteed SLAs
- Traffic engineering and QoS capabilities
- Carrier-managed infrastructure
- High cost, especially for international circuits
What is SD-WAN?
Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN) is a virtual WAN architecture that uses software to control the connectivity, management, and services between data centers, branch offices, and cloud environments. According to VMware's SD-WAN overview, it abstracts network hardware into a software-based virtualized environment.
Key SD-WAN Characteristics:
- Multiple transport options (broadband, LTE, MPLS)
- Centralized management and orchestration
- Application-aware routing
- Integrated security features
- Significantly lower costs than MPLS
- Direct cloud connectivity
Detailed Comparison
Quick Comparison Table:
| Factor | MPLS | SD-WAN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | High ($300-$3000/Mbps/month) | Low ($10-$100/Mbps/month) |
| Deployment Time | 60-180 days | Days to weeks |
| Cloud Integration | Requires backhauling | Direct connectivity |
| Reliability | 99.9% SLA typical | 99.9%+ with redundancy |
| Management | Carrier-managed | Self-service, centralized |
Cost Analysis
Cost is often the primary driver for SD-WAN adoption. According to Gartner research, organizations report 50-90% cost savings when migrating from MPLS to SD-WAN.
MPLS Cost Structure:
- High monthly recurring costs based on bandwidth and distance
- Expensive international circuits
- Long-term contracts (typically 3-5 years)
- Costly bandwidth upgrades
SD-WAN Cost Structure:
- Lower-cost commodity internet connections
- Software licensing fees (per site or per Mbps)
- Potential hardware costs for edge devices
- Flexible scaling with minimal cost impact
Performance and Reliability
MPLS has traditionally held an advantage in predictable performance due to dedicated circuits and carrier SLAs. However, modern SD-WAN solutions from vendors like VMware VeloCloud, Cisco SD-WAN, and Fortinet Secure SD-WAN can achieve comparable or superior reliability through:
- Active-active load balancing: Distribute traffic across multiple links
- Sub-second failover: Automatic rerouting when path quality degrades
- Forward Error Correction (FEC): Minimize packet loss impact
- Packet duplication: Send critical traffic over multiple paths simultaneously
Cloud Connectivity
As organizations migrate workloads to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, MPLS's hub-and-spoke architecture becomes a bottleneck. SD-WAN enables:
- Direct Internet Breakout: Branch offices access cloud services directly
- Cloud on-ramps: Optimized connections to AWS Transit Gateway, Azure Virtual WAN, and Google Cloud
- SaaS optimization: Prioritize Office 365, Salesforce, and other cloud applications
- Reduced latency: Eliminate backhaul through datacenter
Security Considerations
MPLS provides inherent security through private circuits, but SD-WAN delivers comprehensive security through integration:
SD-WAN Security Features:
- Integrated next-generation firewall (NGFW)
- End-to-end encryption (IPsec, TLS)
- Secure web gateway (SWG) integration
- Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
- Cloud-delivered security via Zscaler or Prisma Access
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) converges SD-WAN with cloud-delivered security, as outlined in Gartner's SASE framework.
Use Cases and Recommendations
When MPLS Still Makes Sense
- Real-time voice and video: Applications requiring guaranteed latency and jitter
- Regulatory requirements: Industries mandating private circuits (some financial services)
- Poor internet availability: Locations with unreliable broadband options
- Legacy applications: Systems requiring specific network characteristics
- High security requirements: Organizations preferring air-gapped private networks
When SD-WAN is the Better Choice
- Cloud-first organizations: Heavy use of SaaS and IaaS
- Distributed workforce: Many branch locations requiring connectivity
- Cost optimization: Budget constraints or desire to reduce WAN costs
- Rapid deployment needs: Quick expansion or temporary sites
- Agile networking: Frequent changes to network topology
The Hybrid Approach
Many organizations adopt a hybrid model, using MPLS for critical sites and SD-WAN for branch locations:
- MPLS between data centers for guaranteed performance
- SD-WAN for branch-to-cloud and branch-to-branch traffic
- MPLS as one transport option within SD-WAN overlay
- Gradual migration as MPLS contracts expire
Leading SD-WAN Vendors
Enterprise Leaders
- VMware SD-WAN (VeloCloud): Strong cloud integration, acquired by Broadcom
- Cisco SD-WAN (Viptela): Enterprise-grade with Catalyst integration
- Fortinet Secure SD-WAN: Integrated with FortiGate security
- Aruba EdgeConnect: Focus on application performance
- Versa Networks: Full-featured SASE platform
Cloud Provider Solutions
Migration Strategies
Phased Migration Approach
Phase 1: Pilot (1-3 months)
- Select 3-5 pilot sites representing different use cases
- Deploy SD-WAN alongside existing MPLS
- Validate performance, security, and management
- Refine policies and configurations
Phase 2: Controlled Rollout (3-6 months)
- Deploy to non-critical sites first
- Use MPLS as backup transport if needed
- Monitor application performance and user experience
- Build operational expertise
Phase 3: Full Migration (6-18 months)
- Migrate remaining sites based on MPLS contract renewals
- Transition critical sites during maintenance windows
- Decommission MPLS circuits as sites stabilize
Key Decision Criteria
Use this framework to evaluate your specific situation:
Decision Matrix:
- Application Requirements: Can your applications tolerate internet-based transport?
- Cloud Adoption: What percentage of traffic is destined for cloud services?
- Cost Sensitivity: How much can you save with SD-WAN?
- Deployment Timeline: How quickly do you need new sites online?
- Management Preference: Do you want carrier-managed or self-service control?
- Security Requirements: Can you achieve compliance with internet-based WAN?
- Internet Quality: Is reliable broadband available at your locations?
Conclusion
While MPLS remains relevant for specific use cases, SD-WAN represents the future of enterprise networking for most organizations. The combination of cost savings, cloud optimization, deployment flexibility, and integrated security makes SD-WAN the preferred choice for cloud-forward enterprises.
The decision isn't binary—a hybrid approach often provides the best of both worlds during transition periods. Work with your network team to assess specific requirements, pilot solutions, and develop a migration roadmap that balances risk and reward.
Ready to Evaluate SD-WAN for Your Organization?
Our network architects help enterprises design and deploy SD-WAN solutions optimized for their specific requirements. Let's discuss your WAN transformation.
Schedule Assessment